ATO figures suggest property investors are failing to claim their depreciation correctly, resulting in thousands of dollars in unclaimed tax entitlements.
Recent figures from the ATO indicate 2.8 million property investors claimed deductions related to their rental properties in the 2012-13 income year.
Analysis of the figures by BMT Tax Depreciation suggests that these property investors, who chief executive Bradley Beer is confident include SMSF property investors, are missing out on significant tax deductions.
Amid the debate on the extent to which oversupply may cause a housing fall, a new report has reveale... More >>
Two consumer regulators have released warnings about dodgy p... More >>
Residential vacancy rates in the state capital saw no change... More >>
Labelling stamp duty “unjust and inefficient”, the pres... More >>
Moves by governments and banks to make it more difficult for... More >>
“Of these investors, just over one million received an average capital works deduction of $2,113, while almost two million investors claimed an average deduction of $1,179 for depreciation of plant and equipment, making the total average depreciation claim made by property investors who claimed both in the 2012-13 income year $3,292,” BMT stated.
“When compared with statistics released by the ATO for the 2011-12 income year, there was an increase of almost 100,000 in the total number of investors claiming deductions for their rental properties.
“Despite this, there was very little change in the average deductions claimed for capital works or plant and equipment assets.”
Mr Beer said that although SMSF trustees are typically “a little more” sophisticated than the average property investor, they’re often not entirely aware of the depreciation benefits they can claim.
Further, he expressed concern about the change in the knowledge levels of SMSF investors over time.
“Since the borrowing rules over the last number of years have been relaxed around property for SMSFs, even though they’ve tightened them up again now, people were probably putting properties into SMSFs [who shouldn’t],” Mr Beer said.
“They’re probably less sophisticated than what they were in the past, but possibly a little more sophisticated than the general investor into property,” he said.