Property investors given the upper hand following court case
Landlords can breathe a sigh of relief after a court ruling concerning Airbnb was handed down late last week in favour of property owners.
Landlord Catherine Swan successfully overturned a Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) ruling that a tenant was not in breach of their lease by offering an entire property as a short-term rental through Airbnb, according to a release from the Supreme Court of Victoria.
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Ms Swan rented her two-bedroom St Kilda apartment to tenants Barbara Uecker and Michael Greaves in August 2015 and later discovered that they had made a spare bedroom in the apartment available through Airbnb.
In January this year, the entire apartment was made available for short-term rent through Airbnb and Ms Swan appealed to VCAT to evict the tenants on the grounds of breaching their lease with a sub-letting arrangement.
VCAT had previously dismissed the case on the basis that the Ms Uecker and Mr Greaves had granted 'licenses to occupy' to Airbnb guests, rather than leases, meaning tenants do not need permission from landlords.
Ms Swan, however, appealed the decision in the Supreme Court of Victoria and had it successfully put aside.
The Honourable Justice Clyde Elliott Croft said the Airbnb Agreement is properly characterised as a lease.
"It follows that their entering into this agreement is, having regard to their own tenancy of the apartment, a sub-lease," Justice Croft said.
"Consequently, the respondents, the tenants, are in breach of the provisions of their lease of the apartment, namely, cl 54 of the 'Additional Terms' which does not permit sub-letting without the written authorisation from the landlord or the landlord’s agent."
Justice Croft said the original move by Ms Swan to evict the tenants was valid and she should be granted possession of the property.
