Outgoings estimates now vital in Victorian retail
Retail tenants who aren’t provided with an outgoings estimate each year are not required to pay outgoings, a new judgment from Victoria has confirmed.
In a knowledge update by Madgwicks Lawyers partner Rohan Ingleton, the lawyer flagged a Supreme Court decision in Victoria has confirmed that where a landlord does not provide a tenant with an estimate for outgoings on a yearly basis, the tenant is not obligated to pay such costs.
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Mr Ingleton said property managers need to ensure that a tenant under the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) Act is given an estimate of outgoings in accordance with that act.
“This means that an estimate needs to be given before the lease is entered into and annually before the commencement of each year of the term of the lease,” the lawyer said.
The Supreme Court decision being referred to by Mr Ingleton is that of Verraty Pty Ltd v Richmond Football Club, with the initial Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal having come to the same conclusion.
Mr Ingleton said the Supreme Court appeal’s judgment usefully expressed that interpreting otherwise “makes the consequences of a landlord not giving a notice meaningless”.
In summary, outgoings can’t be recovered from a tenant if the notice has not been given, the lawyer flagged.
More from this writer:
-
Why 2024 will be a better time to buy commercial property
-
Which Aussie city is the best for capital growth in 2024?
-
Basic plumbing can now be carried out by residents in WA
-
How Melbourne is preparing for a population the size of London by 2050
-
RBA delivers March cash rate decision
-
Victorian investors must be better incentivised
-
WA’s tight rental market ‘needs every property it can get’
