“Fundamental misunderstanding” in negative gearing changes

Spend

PIPA chairman Peter Koulizos said that Labor’s policy shows it fails to understand and appreciate the vital part investors play in the property sector.

“Property investors provide housing for 30 per cent of Australians at a time when spending on social housing is at an all-time low,” the chairman said.

“Also, contrary to media headlines, only about 70 per cent of investors own one property, so the concept of ‘greedy investors’ is not supported by the facts.”

The 2018 PIPA Property Investment Sentiment Survey reinforced that negative gearing is not a strategy, but rather a moment in time because of the high transactional costs associated with real estate investment.

The survey found that about 60 per cent of investors say their portfolio will be positively geared within five years, and 71 per cent believe changing negative gearing and capital gains tax policy will not improve housing affordability.

Long-term

Only 6 per cent said they were interested in buying a new property, which again shows that restricting negative gearing to brand-new dwellings would not increase supply.

“The PIPA survey found that long-term capital growth beat out cash flow, both long- and short-term, as the most important aspect when choosing an investment,” Mr Koulizos said.

“In fact, short-term tax benefits were seen as the least important driver when choosing an investment.”

Mr Koulizos also said that restricting negative gearing to new properties may see an increase in the numbers of spruikers hoping to make a quick buck in the market.

“Fly-by-nighters will become even more active and will do whatever it takes to lure investors with promises of returns that are literally too good to be true,” the chairman said.

Cash cow

PICA chairman Ben Kingsley said that the government should stop using investors as a never-ending cash cow.

“The financial impost on investors, who are just trying to improve their futures by generally buying one or perhaps two properties, is out of control,” Mr Kingsley said.

“Between council, state and federal government taxes, investors pay back far more than they might receive in the short period of time that they claim negative gearing.”

Mr Kingsley said that research undertaken last year showed investors paid billions of dollars in taxes.

With the population booming, and the markets in Sydney and Melbourne softening, it made no sense to implement a policy that would likely decimate the sector even further, according to the chairman.

“Not only will thousands of jobs be lost, investors will retreat from the market at a time when more housing is needed the most,” Mr Kingsley said.

“The end result will likely be worsening housing affordability and rents skyrocketing as our growing population compete for a limited supply of accommodation.”

Economics

Mr Kingsley said that Labor needs to listen to industry professionals warning of the dire consequences of its proposal.

“There seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of the laws of demand and supply in Labor’s approach to property taxation,” the chairman said.

“Until the federal government decides to regulate the provision of property investment advice, non-profit associations like PIPA and PICA will continue to warn investors about the dangers of working with unscrupulous operators.”

PIPA and PICA request that the federal government establish a working group of relevant industry bodies to better understand the important role of property investment for the Australian economy.