You have 0 free articles left this month.
Advertisement

Time’s up for negative gearing?

15 OCT 2014 By James Mitchell, John Bastick & Vivienne Kelly 4 min read Tax & Legal

A leading economist has called on the federal government to end negative gearing to limit the potential damage of a dangerously overheated investor market.

arrow7

The Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s chief economist, Saul Eslake, said the controversial property tax should be “grandfathered” – continued for those who currently use it and banned hereon in for everybody else.

Neither was Mr Eslake a fan of the RBA’s mooted changes to lending laws – where investor borrowing limits would be curbed – saying they wouldn’t work or, worse, would hurt those who are not the source of the problem.

He said ending tax concessions through negative gearing going forward was the “simple answer” without impacting those who already use it.

“If you grandfather it so that you’re not taking it away from the 15 per cent of the electorate who has it, then my view is: what’s the problem?” he said.

 
 

Mr Eslake agreed that the biggest hurdle to eliminating negative gearing was convincing politicians they wouldn’t be walloped at the ballot box by furious investors.

“If the government or the opposition were to present it properly, nor should there be a political backlash because they are not taking a privilege away from anyone who is currently enjoying it,” he said.

However, senior economist at the Domain Group, Dr Andrew Wilson, believes negative gearing is so entrenched, that the pros far outweigh the cons, and thus it’s here to stay.

Dr Wilson believes investors build the dwellings governments used to and “as investors, there are no guarantees that you’ll get your tenant, you’ll get your yield, you’ll get your cash flow, or your capital growth” and they should be duly compensated for that with tax concessions.

“If there’s no incentive the property market would be dead,” Dr Wilson told The Adviser. “Investors would take their money to equity markets or gold or stamp collecting.

“The argument against negative gearing is a nonsense; sure they might tinker with (the laws) at the edges, but it’s here to say,” he said.

Dr Wilson's comments echo those of Century 21 Australasia's owner and managing director Charles Tarbey, who at a media briefing on Monday morning, said the housing market's current issues relate back to supply, not investor spending or overactivity. 

RELATED TERMS

Gearing
Gearing is defined as the relationship between debt and equity of a company that shows how much of its operations are financed by lenders or shareholders.
Negative gearing
Negative gearing occurs when the rental income of a property is not enough to cover the total costs of managing the rental and re-paying the interest portion of the loan.
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
spi subscribe logo

Get the latest news & updates

Join a community of over 80,000 property investors.